Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Kohli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Kohli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO - no notable roles, contribution or coverage - eight out of nine citations are links of his social media posts such as tweets and Instagram posts. Thus fails WP:GNG. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://deadline.com/2019/08/netflix-haunting-of-bly-manor-cast-izombie-rahul-kohli-catherine-parker-1202708101/Deadline
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/actor-rahul-kohli-on-converting-izombie-costars-to-gaming-2-191669/Rolling Stones
https://deadline.com/2017/02/rahul-kohli-happy-anniversary-netflix-denis-menochet-lior-ashkenazi-entebbe-movie-1201903469/Deadline
Obviously all the social media references in the article need to go, but the subject himself passes the notability standards, in my opinion. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:ACTOR, Actors has had significant roles in multiple notable films is the criterion to have a standalone article. Even though the subject, Rahul Kohli, was part of a 71 episodes series, he had no further significant roles in other series or films; he, therefore, fails WP:ACTOR. And I reviewed all the sources that you provided above; none of them give significant coverage to Rahul Kohli directly and in detail; so he fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. thus delete.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 14:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Akhiljaxxn, as for WP:NACTOR, this is going to depend on your definition of "significant roles". I believe his roles in the productions I listed above are significant. As for WP:GNG, this will depend on your definition of "significant coverage" which is "directly and in detail" about the subject. The Rolling Stones article is solely about the subject, so I would say that, at the very least, it is "directly" about him. The two Deadline articles discuss a couple of different actors, but there is no requirement that a source be solely about the subject. There are, however, more articles that I can cite if the cumulative effect of those above is not sufficient to meet sourcing requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dflaw4 (talkcontribs) 00:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Just thought I should disclose that the users TamilMirchi, KartikeyaS343, Cedix and myself have recently received Talk page messages from Akhiljaxxn (the nominator of this AfD) with a link to this discussion and 2 others. To avoid any question of WP:CANVASSING, I will not be participating here. Cheers, 1292simon (talk)
I messaged a few editors who are known for their expertise in the field of discussions related to AfD. I wanted to draw a wider range of informed but uninvolved editors' input for this. And my message was "I would like to bring your attention: for your input here (link 1), here (link 2) and here (link 3)." I thought WP:APPNOTE allowed this.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given possible canvassing relisting what is otherwise a delete consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.